What we can learn from the third world

Town & Country Planning, February 2001

Gonoshasthaya Kendra is a former field hospital from the Bangladeshi war of independence, deep in the countryside. Not the kind of thing you stumble upon wandering around a modern city.

It has also been converted into a major experimental centre for community economics, as a network of micro-credit systems, workshops for the very poor - plus a school and an ayurvedic hospital.

I know this partly because, in December, it was also the venue for one of the most important international conferences on public health ever held, the People's Health Assembly, attracting more than 1,500 delegates from 92 different countries.

But I also know it because my New Economics Foundation colleague Sarah Burns, who has been working so hard recently to successfully launch Time Banks UK, was among the 1,500 and among the speakers.

She shared platforms with some of the leading figures in grassroots health, and I know she had an extraordinary time, sandwiched between hospital administrators from south London and barefoot medics from the African bush - not to mention a smattering of be-suited officials from the WHO, mouthing statistics.

This was also a salutary lesson for me, because I had forgotten for a moment the number of times I have written articles entitled 'What we can learn from the third world'. There I was writing funding applications so that we could take the social currencies idea to the burgeoning cities of the developing world, when all the time they had their own perfectly good tradition of the same idea.

Like, for example, the social banking programmes of the Indian state of Kerala, a series of franchises that post ordinary people's skills and time so that they can be exchanged without cash.

Or the Pakistani 'time bank' systems used to help needy groups who have fallen outside the powerful social capital of mainstream society, like those in a low caste or with mental health problems.

Or, of course, the social banks in Cuba, which mobilise huge sections of the population to tackle malaria-infested regions.

The point is that, while we've been busy in the rich North developing all these new kinds of money, time banks and barter currencies - there is an equally effective tradition around the world which is also emerging. It includes the highly successful but controversial printed bonds used in the southern states of Argentina and the complex tlaloc currency (named after the local rain god) in Mexico City.
One of the most exciting is the Thai bia currency (featured in the latest New Internationalist magazine), launched with the help of Dutch, Canadian and Japanese agencies. And the bia is an object lesson in how local currencies can allow communities to keep money circulating locally by substituting for expensive imports,
Once the system was up and running in a handful of villages in the Kud Chum district last year, villagers began to realise how much of their hard currency was going out of the area to buy their children's sweets - not to mention what it was doing to their teeth.

The result: they began producing their own locally-produced children's snacks, sold partly in the national baht currency and partly in bia. That formed the basis for a market selling locally made shampoo, detergent and other household necessities.

The downside of the story is that the Bank of Thailand has recently announced that the bia is illegal, and local police have spread the rumour - effective whether it's true or not - that possessing bia notes could make anyone liable for arrest as a threat to national security.

As local aid worker Jeff Powell puts it, the bia "just might result in a reallocation of wealth, tilting the playing field ever so slightly towards communities and away from corporations. And maybe, just maybe, there are some people, there are some people in Thailand and elsewhere who don't like the idea of village people doing just that."
All the more reason for spreading the idea of parallel currencies until they become unstoppable. Corporations are issuing them, after all, and so are cities. We may have to take back the right to create our own money first in the North before the Southern authorities dare relax enough to allow it.

But if it makes the unwieldy global financial system just a bit safer for us all, then even the Bank of Thailand might find itself benefiting from it.







Top of Page · Back to Index · Back Home